Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance

نویسندگان

  • Tobias Opthof
  • Loet Leydesdorff
چکیده

The Center for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University advocates the use of specific normalizations for assessing research performance with reference to a world average. The Journal Citation Score (JCS) and Field Citation Score (FCS) are averaged for the research group or individual researcher under study, and then these values are used as denominators of the (mean) Citations per publication (CPP). Thus, this normalization is based on dividing two averages. This procedure only generates a legitimate indicator in the case of underlying normal distributions. Given the skewed distributions under study, one should average the observed versus expected values which are to be divided first for each publication. We show the effects of the Leiden normalization for a recent evaluation where we happened to have access to the

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The danger of pseudoscience in Informetrics

In their recent paper ‘Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance’ Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) point out that it is important to first ‘multiply and divide’ before ‘adding and subtract’ instead of the other way round, as promoted by the CWTS. In their reply van Raan et al (2010) state that: ‘... the order of operations argument ...

متن کامل

CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre

The article “Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance”, published by Tobias Opthof and Loet Leydesdorff (Opthof & Leydesdorff, 2010), denoted as O&L below, deals with a subject as important as the application of so called field normalized indicators of citation impact in the assessment of research performance of individual resea...

متن کامل

Normalization, CWTS indicators, and the Leiden Rankings: Differences in citation behavior at the level of fields

Van Raan et al. (2010; arXiv:1003.2113) have proposed a new indicator (MNCS) for field normalization. Since field normalization is also used in the Leiden Rankings of universities, we elaborate our critique of journal normalization in Opthof & Leydesdorff (2010; arXiv:1002.2769) in this rejoinder concerning field normalization. Fractional citation counting thoroughly solves the issue of normali...

متن کامل

Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations

Van Raan et al. (2010) accepted our critique for the case of journal normalization (previously CPP/JCSm); CWTS has in the meantime adapted its procedures. However, a new indicator was proposed for field normalization (previously CPP/FCSm), called the “mean normalized citation score” (MNCS; cf. Lundberg, 2007). In our opinion, this latter change does not sufficiently resolve the problems. Since ...

متن کامل

Generation of Helper Plasmids Encoding Mutant Adeno-associated Virus Type 2 Capsid Proteins with Increased Resistance against Proteasomal Degradation

  Objective(s): Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) vectors are widely used for both experimental and clinical gene therapy. A recent research has shown that the performance of these vectors can be greatly improved by substitution of specific surface-exposed tyrosine residues with phenylalanines. In this study, a fast and simple method is presented to generate AAV2 vector helper plasmids encod...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • J. Informetrics

دوره 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010